it vs computer science

Do you want to become an expert in the telecom industry? Forbes recommends reading daily digests of the top news and blog sites as one of the crucial steps to become an industry expert in your field.  Versa Technology has collected the top 50 sites to help you become an industry expert in the Telecom and computer networking sphere.

Do you have other source sites you’d like to recommend? Let us know by leaving a comment below.

1. Fierce Telecom – Fierce Telecom is an invaluable resource that provides the latest news on telecom companies, backhaul, Ethernet, IPTV, and many other telecom trends. Fierce Telecom is part of the Fierce Market family that covers industries beyond the Telecom sector. All Fierce Telecom sister sites offer an array of resources including live events, webinars, e-books, and many other educational resources.
2. FierceCable – If you’re a cable provider, visit FierceCable to remain on top of the latest news on voice, video and data service trends.  
3. Fierce Wireless – Follow Fierce Wireless to access expert analysis of trends in the wireless communications industry.
4. FierceBigData – FierceBigData targets those in the Enterprise IT sector that work with the exponential growth of data. The site provides news on “data management and analytics, data architecture, big data systems, and other key issues”.  
5. FierceEnterpriseCommunications – FierceEnterpriseCommunications provides current news in the IP communications to maintain enterprise communication providers up-to-date
6. FierceITSecurity – FierceITSecurity targets those responsible for maintaining the Cyber Security of their enterprise and is a major news source for topics such as security, malware defense, and many others.
7. FierceInstaller – FierceInstaller is must-have resource for cabling technicians, outside plant engineers, cell site installers and the many other types of installers in telecom sector.
8. Light Reading – If the Fierce Market Family didn’t cover so many niches, we’d recommend Light Reading as your number one resource to stay up to date in the telecom sphere. Visit this site to find news and information on anything related to the network communications industry including optical, cable, Ethernet/IP developments, and many other related fields.
9. Telecomramblings – Telecomramblings is another great b2b resource that provides information on the developments on the infrastructure of the Internet such as backhaul networks, long-haul metro networks, VoIP, unified communications and other industries.    
10. TelcoProfessionals – TelcoProfessionals is  a great site to network with other professionals in the industry. Resources inclu

Software Engineer Vs Web Developer

As discussed above, the main difference between software engineering and computer science is that software engineering focuses on the software, whereas computer science focuses on the hardware. Both branches require a solid knowledge of hardware, as programmers are expected to be able to implement solutions on top of simply divining them.

If undecided, best look into the programs offered. Different colleges offer different programs. Compare them and see which ones speak to you. Software engineers mainly deal with the application of engineering processes. They focus on programming and algorithms. Computer scientists deal mostly with hardware interface and software systems. If you are into creating apps and games, the latter is the right choice for you.

The question of a software engineer salary versus a computer science salary should not be the determining factor when choosing your profession. Both vocations are highly rewarding salary-wise, and rapid developments in the field will further step up the demand. Rather than choosing your future vocation based on median pay, it’s better to focus on your preferences and stay up to date with new technology. This is a certain way to boost your salary.

How Much Do Computer Science Majors Make

A major in computer science and programming opens many lucrative doors. Many of these students become software engineers and programmers at one of the many technological companies throughout the country. Others find computational theory attractive.

 Graduate degrees strengthen students’ skills, Information Technology Vs Computer Science increasing their value to employers. Since the field is rapidly advancing, many blogs have sprung up to address all aspects of the field. But which ones are the best to read and why? This list of thirty blogs represents a diverse array of perspectives on computer science, programming, computational theory, and the intersection of computer science with contemporary issues such as education, women in the sciences, business, and many more.

Software engineers may expect high salaries. This depends on their skill set and specialization, as well as on the actual position. Senior positions usually call for a doctoral degree or continued education. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the median software engineer salary is $102,280 per annum, with the starting salary being $56,856. In addition, it is expected that the number of software engineering jobs will rise 17% by 2024.

‍

Fields Of Computer Science

Software engineers may expect high salaries. This depends on their skill set and specialization, as well as on the actual position. Senior positions usually call for a doctoral degree or continued education. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the median software engineer salary is $102,280 per annum, with the starting salary being $56,856.
 In addition, it is expected that the number of software engineering jobs will rise 17% by 2024.

‍Fresh computer science graduates may expect the minimum salary of $39,000 per annum. This, again, depends on their skill set. Continued education and certification is always an option in the field and it always leads to career advancements. Certification programs are available through professional organizations, software companies, and product and service vendors. There is a lot of room for growth with the median computer scientist salary being $76,205 per annul.

The ideal option for both professions would be adopting a freelance or consultant position. Freelance engineers will easily find remote jobs. The gig-economy is booming and businesses are currently urgently in search of engineers.

The IT sector has been the fastest growing one in decades, with the trend predicted to continue. It goes without saying that up-to-date knowledge is absolutely essential for all computer-related professionals, as technology evolves rapidly to keep up with the demand.

Freelance engineering is the future. Start your freelance career today by signing up on Field Engineer and take a look at your prospective jobs!

Computer Science Vs Information Technology

Software engineers may expect high salaries. This depends on their skill set and specialization, as well as on the actual position. Senior positions usually call for a doctoral degree or continued education. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the median software engineer salary is $102,280 per annum, with the starting salary being $56,856.
 In addition, it is expected that the number of software engineering jobs will rise 17% by 2024.

‍Fresh computer science graduates may expect the minimum salary of $39,000 per annum. This, again, depends on their skill set. Continued education and certification is always an option in the field and it always leads to career advancements. Certification programs are available through professional organizations, software companies, and product and service vendors. There is a lot of room for growth with the median computer scientist salary being $76,205 per annul.

The ideal option for both professions would be adopting a freelance or consultant position. Freelance engineers will easily find remote jobs. The gig-economy is booming and businesses are currently urgently in search of engineers.

The IT sector has been the fastest growing one in decades, with the trend predicted to continue. It goes without saying that up-to-date knowledge is absolutely essential for all computer-related professionals, as technology evolves rapidly to keep up with the demand.

Freelance engineering is the future. Start your freelance career today by signing up on Field Engineer and take a look at your prospective jobs!
‍

Top Telecommunication Company In The World

A major flaw in current U.S. telecom policy is that takes a completely backwards approach. Instead of first establishing an infrastructure standard – fiber to the premise (FTTP) – it begins with a level of service standard: bandwidth. That set the stage for years of unproductive debate over what constitutes an acceptable level of throughput for Internet service, mostly measured in bandwidth but also latency. At the same time, bandwidth demand doubles about every three years. What was deemed sufficient bandwidth not long ago soon becomes less than adequate. Policymakers end up chasing their tails, caught on the downside of the bandwidth growth curve and skating to where the puck was instead of where it’s going.

Unhappy with slow and congested bandwidth, telecommunications Americans continually pressure their elected representatives for more bandwidth to support faster throughput, making it one of the top issues for their constituents. Nationwide, the politicians are listening. Hearing their constituent complaints, they proclaim the problem is poor “broadband speeds.” “Better broadband” is the obvious solution. But among them, only Sen. Elizabeth Warren seems to correctly understand the issue. She has put the chips in the correct order in her presidential campaign’s telecom policy. First, it sets forth an infrastructure standard, proposing generous federal grants to electricity and telephone cooperatives, non-profit organizations, tribes, cities, counties, and other state subdivisions to build FTTP reaching every American home. Second, it establishes a level of service standard: symmetrical bandwidth of at least 100 Mbps both directions.

Telecom Industry Growth

A major flaw in current U.S. telecom policy is that takes a completely backwards approach. Instead of first establishing an infrastructure standard – fiber to the premise (FTTP) – it begins with a level of service standard: bandwidth. That set the stage for years of unproductive debate over what constitutes an acceptable level of throughput for Internet service, mostly measured in bandwidth but also latency. At the same time, bandwidth demand doubles about every three years. What was deemed sufficient bandwidth not long ago soon becomes less than adequate. Policymakers end up chasing their tails, caught on the downside of the bandwidth growth curve and skating to where the puck was instead of where it’s going.

Unhappy with slow and congested bandwidth, telecommunications Americans continually pressure their elected representatives for more bandwidth to support faster throughput, making it one of the top issues for their constituents. Nationwide, the politicians are listening. Hearing their constituent complaints, they proclaim the problem is poor “broadband speeds.” “Better broadband” is the obvious solution. But among them, only Sen. Elizabeth Warren seems to correctly understand the issue. She has put the chips in the correct order in her presidential campaign’s telecom policy. First, it sets forth an infrastructure standard, proposing generous federal grants to electricity and telephone cooperatives, non-profit organizations, tribes, cities, counties, and other state subdivisions to build FTTP reaching every American home. Second, it establishes a level of service standard: symmetrical bandwidth of at least 100 Mbps both directions.

Global Security Services

The CIO and CSO need to be peers.  IT and security need to have equal representation in the board room, making sure the executives have accurate information.  Typically the CIO will report to the COO and the CSO will report to CFO.  The COO and CFO directly report to the executive.  However an organization decides to structure it, the CIO and CSO must have a different reporting structure.

In order for the CIO and CSO’s to have an effective working relationship, they must have clear boundaries of responsibility.  Typically what works best is for the CSO to define the proper level of security, the CIO to implement the security and the auditor to validate that the security is being done correctly. 

security connection

 The security that is defined by the CSO should be based off of metrics that are used as a reporting structure to the executives, so they can understand the proper level of risk to accept for the organization.  Metrics based security is key to success.  With metrics there are clear guidelines of what must be done and an easy way to measure compliance.

Organizations in this day and age must have a CSO.  Every day that passes, with more breaches becoming public, it becomes easy to convince the executives that they need a CSO.  The problem is many CIO’s do not want to have a CSO, because it is easier for them to accomplish their jobs if they control all aspects of the IT infrastructure.  Therefore the CIO will not usually lobby for a CSO.  There needs to be another advocate convincing the CEO.  The simple question to sell the CEO is “are you comfortable with the level of security at your organization and are you receiving the proper security metrics to make the decisions?”  The problem today is many CEO’s want to create a position of a CSO, but the CIO convinces them they do not need one.  While they have good intentions, it is often the CIO that lobbies against a CSO, since a CSO will cause them to give up control and potentially make their job more difficult.  For example, when a CSO comes in they often disclose all of the security problems, which show that security was not being properly addressed within the organization.

Security Connection

The CIO and CSO need to be peers.  IT and security need to have equal representation in the board room, making sure the executives have accurate information.  Typically the CIO will report to the COO and the CSO will report to CFO.  The COO and CFO directly report to the executive.  However an organization decides to structure it, the CIO and CSO must have a different reporting structure.

In order for the CIO and CSO’s to have an effective working relationship, they must have clear boundaries of responsibility.  Typically what works best is for the CSO to define the proper level of security, the CIO to implement the security and the auditor to validate that the security is being done correctly. 

security connection

 The security that is defined by the CSO should be based off of metrics that are used as a reporting structure to the executives, so they can understand the proper level of risk to accept for the organization.  Metrics based security is key to success.  With metrics there are clear guidelines of what must be done and an easy way to measure compliance.

Organizations in this day and age must have a CSO.  Every day that passes, with more breaches becoming public, it becomes easy to convince the executives that they need a CSO.  The problem is many CIO’s do not want to have a CSO, because it is easier for them to accomplish their jobs if they control all aspects of the IT infrastructure.  Therefore the CIO will not usually lobby for a CSO.  There needs to be another advocate convincing the CEO.  The simple question to sell the CEO is “are you comfortable with the level of security at your organization and are you receiving the proper security metrics to make the decisions?”  The problem today is many CEO’s want to create a position of a CSO, but the CIO convinces them they do not need one.  While they have good intentions, it is often the CIO that lobbies against a CSO, since a CSO will cause them to give up control and potentially make their job more difficult.  For example, when a CSO comes in they often disclose all of the security problems, which show that security was not being properly addressed within the organization.

Global Security Services

Wireless cameras have more flexibility, but broadcasts from other devices such as wireless Internet, cordless phones and baby monitors -- can interrupt a wireless camera's signal. Also, keep in mind that if you decide on a wireless system, there's a possibility your video feeds could be intercepted by others. Having someone else monitor your activity around the house or finding out whether or not you're at home defeats the purpose of having security cameras. If you're worried about your personal security, you can check with the manufacturer to see whether or not they encrypt their wireless system.

Larger cameras will be visible, and people typically install them outside or in an area where people know they're under video surveillance. You can also find smaller, hidden cameras online in many different forms -- a tiny camera hidden inside of an alarm clock, for instance, or a small pinhole camera that fits inside of an intercom system.

But before you install any type of security system into your home -- especially the small, "hidden" type -- you should note the legal restrictions on video surveillance. In most states, anyone recording either audio or video in a specified area needs to alert anyone in range of the surveillance device that he or she is being recorded.

 For instance, if you record someone's telephone conversation without them knowing it, that's illegal. It's also true that if you install a tiny camera into a room in your house without letting anyone know it's there, you're technically breaking the law. If anyone found the camera and wasn't previously aware of its existence, you could potentially face charges